Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Learning strategies and classification methods for verification of signatures from scanned documents are proposed and evaluated. Learning strategies considered are writer independent- those that learn from a set of signature sample (including forgeries) prior to enrollment of a writer, and writer dependent- those that learn only from a newly enrolled individual. Classification methods considered include two distance based methods (one based on a threshold, which is the standard method of signature verification and biometrics, and the other based on a distance probability distribution), a Nave Bayes (NB) classifier based on pairs of feature bit values and a support vector machine (SVM). Two scenarios are considered for the writer dependent scenario: (i) without forgeries (one-class problem) and (ii) with forgery samples being available (two class problem). The features used to characterize a signature capture local geometry, stroke and topology information in the form of a binary vector. In the one-class scenario distance methods are superior while in the two-class SVM based method outperforms the other methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srihari et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: