The authors considered how the way in which knowledge is organized influences cientific reasoning. They adopted a constructivist approach to reasoning in which many-to-one schemata, linguistic mapping, and meaningful relations are assumed to be important components of hypothesis-testing skill. College students received a variant of Wason's election task in which the semantic ontent was either familiar or unfamiliar and the interclause r lations either did or did not express entailment. Results howed that entailment, which reflects knowledge organiza-tion, was more important than familiarity in determining adequate performance. These findings imply that the constructivist view proposed here is a more adequate account of reasoning than others because it alone emphasizes the organization of knowledge as important. Conditional reasoning--that is, reasoning with propositions of the form "if p, then q"--represents a critical form of deductive thought (Mayer, 1983; Overton, 1990). The impor-tance of conditional reasoning to educational issues derives from the fact that scientific reasoning consists of the formation and testing of "if...then " hypotheses and of the drawing of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: