Key result
This review outlines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of currently licensed VKAs and NOACs to demonstrate how variations influence their clinical use in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
The availability of both NOACs and VKAs requires a good understanding of their pharmacological properties to maximise therapeutic benefit and minimise patient harm.
Understanding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of oral anticoagulants is essential to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize patient harm in atrial fibrillation.
Introduction: The availability of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anti-coagulants alongside vitamin K antagonists has offered a variety of options for anti-coagulation, but has also necessitated a good understanding of the pharmacological properties of each of these drugs prior to their use, to maximise the therapeutic benefit and minimise patient harmAreas covered: This review article outlines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the currently licensed VKAs and NOACs that are most commonly used in clinical practice, with the aim of demonstrating how variations in these characteristics influence their use in clinical practice. A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords and relevant articles published by the 31st of December 2018 were included.Expert opinion: The effect of a drug is determined by a combination of elements which include patient characteristics and external factors, in addition to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. A good understanding of these is essential. Despite the wealth of information available, particularly on VKAs, our knowledge on the pharmacology responsible for certain drug effects and inter-individual variations is still limited. Increasing efforts are being made to understand these and include focus on pharmacogenomics and drug transporter proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fawzy et al. (2019) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulants (VKAs and NOACs) was evaluated. This review outlines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of currently licensed VKAs and NOACs to demonstrate how variations influence their clinical use in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: