Key result
Reduced-dose NOACs linked to ~37% lower stroke or systemic embolism risk vs. warfarin in AF.
Why the study?
Reduced-dose NOACs are commonly prescribed to Asian patients with nonvalvular AF, but comparative risk data against warfarin were needed.
Do reduced-dose NOACs reduce the risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=27,532)
Do reduced-dose NOACs reduce the risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In a real-world Asian population with atrial fibrillation, reduced-dose NOACs demonstrated superior effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin.
Reduced-dose NOACs were associated with lower S/SE risk in Korean AF; extends low-certainty observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Reduced-dose nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly prescribed to Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aimed to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between patients treated with reduced-dose NOACs and those treated with warfarin, using the claims database in Korea. Patients with NVAF newly initiated on oral anticoagulants (OACs; apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) between 1 July 2015 and 30 November 2016 were included. Among all patients with NVAF treated with OACs, 5249, 6033, 7602, and 8648 patients were treated with reduced-dose apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. Patients treated with reduced-dose NOACs were older and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores than those treated with warfarin. Compared to warfarin, all reduced-dose NOACs showed significantly lower risk of S/SE (hazard ratios (95% confidence interval), 0.63 (0.52–0.75) for apixaban; 0.51 (0.42–0.61) for dabigatran; and 0.67 (0.57–0.79) for rivaroxaban) and MB (0.54 (0.45–0.65) for apixaban; 0.58 (0.49–0.69) for dabigatran; 0.73 (0.63–0.85) for rivaroxaban). In the real-world practice among Asians with NVAF, all reduced-dose NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of S/SE and MB compared to those of warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (n=27,532). Reduced-dose NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Stroke or systemic embolism (reduced-dose apixaban versus warfarin) (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.75). Reduced-dose NOACs significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (apixaban HR 0.63, dabigatran HR 0.51, rivaroxaban HR 0.67) in Korean patients with AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: