A bewildering array of potentially useful financial ratios is available for use. The user, however, will usually want to make decisions based on only a few ratios. For example, Chen and Shimerda [3] identify 41 different ratios that apparently serve some useful predictive or explanatory purpose. This set of 41 ratios is obtained by reviewing 26 previous studies in which a total of 100 ratios are examined. A set of 100 or even 41 financial ratios would be much too cumbersome to be employed in a decision model. Consequently, in several studies [4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13] an attempt is made to reduce the dimensionality of a variable set by developing patterns among financial ratios via factor analysis. The purpose of this study is to extend previous studies of financial ratio patterns by examining cross-industry stability of financial ratio patterns. A secondary purpose of this paper is to assess the sensitivity of these patterns to differences in accounting constructs, for example, using net income plus depreciation as a proxy for cash flow. The motivation behind developing financial ratio patterns is discussed in the next section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gombola et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: