Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the association between the presence of pre-admission programs directed at underrepresented minority (URM) students at medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) and the first-year and total enrollments of URM students during the 1993-94 academic year. METHOD: The authors ranked 119 LCME-accredited medical schools by the percentages of their first-year classes and total enrollments made up of URM students. They then compared the schools in three ways: (1) schools ranking above versus below the median in terms of numbers of URM students; (2) the top 25% versus the lower 75%; and (3) the top 25% versus the lowest 25%. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between the presence of pre-admission programs and URM enrollment. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the medical schools had pre-admission programs. For both first-year and total enrollments, each comparison showed that schools ranked as having higher percentages of URM students (above the mean and in the top 25%) were more likely to have pre-admission programs than were the schools ranked lower (below the mean, lower 75%, and lowest 25%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the presence of pre-admission programs is positively associated with enrollment of URM students at U.S. medical schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strayhorn et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: