Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article challenges the widespread view that there is both a science and an art of medicine. Through examination of recent work in medical humanities --Jodi Halpern's From Detached Concern to Empathy (2001), Kathryn Montgomery's How Doctors Think (2006), and Rita Charon's Narrative Medicine (2006)--I argue that while a variety of epistemic techniques are important in medicine, it is not helpful to dichotomize them as "science" versus "art." I assess the epistemic strengths and weaknesses of narrative medicine, a recent exemplar of humanistic medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miriam Solomon (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: