Key result
Left ventricular hypertrophy increased the risk of arrhythmic mortality (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.08-1.69), while left bundle-branch block and conduction delay increased arrhythmic and total mortality by 50%.
Why the study?
Do ECG markers of conduction abnormalities and left ventricular hypertrophy predict arrhythmic death and total mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia?
Population
n=1638 patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained…
Comparison
Presence of ECG markers of conduction… vs Absence of the respective ECG markers
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
In patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, left bundle-branch block and intraventricular conduction delay are independent predictors of both arrhythmic and total mortality.
Cohort (n=1,638)
Yes
Do ECG markers of conduction abnormalities and left ventricular hypertrophy predict arrhythmic death and total mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia?
Hazard Ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.08–1.69)
In patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, left bundle-branch block and intraventricular conduction delay are independent predictors of both arrhythmic and total mortality.
Zimetbaum et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease, impaired ventricular function, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n=1,638). ECG markers of conduction abnormalities and left ventricular hypertrophy vs. Absence of these ECG markers was evaluated on Arrhythmic death and total mortality (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.69). Left ventricular hypertrophy increased the risk of arrhythmic mortality (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.08-1.69), while left bundle-branch block and conduction delay increased arrhythmic and total mortality by 50%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: