Implementation of effective policy instruments to reduce emissions from non-point agricultural sources has been challenging. Mussel farming has the potential to mitigate diffuse nitrogen losses from agricultural production, and a Water Quality Trading Market (WQTM) between agricultural and mussel farmers could potentially be an efficient mechanism. We simulate a hypothetical WQTM in a catchment in northern Denmark using a relatively new approach referred to as a smart market for water quality. Building on previous work, we integrate mussel farmers as nitrogen permit sellers in a WQTM involving agricultural farmers and analyze the effect of the market on the cost of meeting water quality improvement targets. In addition, we set-up scenarios with decreasing levels of participation by agricultural farmers (−10%, −20% and − 30%). The results show a clear benefit from allowing trading between agricultural and mussel farmers, reducing the total costs by as much as 11.9%. Lower participation results in reductions in the benefits from trade. However, allowing mussel-based mitigation to supply N permits at modest cost can potentially partially circumvent the well-documented challenge that agricultural farmers are reluctant to act as N permit suppliers in WQTMs. The study illustrates the economic and environmental potential of integrating land- and marine-based farmers in a joint policy scheme to reduce nitrogen emissions to coastal and marine areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippelli et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: