Is nonhuman animal-assisted therapy (AAT) a form of exploitation? After exploring possible moral vindications of AAT and after establishing a distinction between "use" and "exploitation," the essay distinguishes between forms of animal-assisted therapy that are morally unobjectionable and those modes of it that ought to be abolished.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzachi Zamir (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: