Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we present a defect prediction model based on ensemble of classifiers, which has not been fully explored so far in this type of research. We have conducted several experiments on public datasets. Our results reveal that ensemble of classifiers considerably improve the defect detection capability compared to Naive Bayes algorithm. We also conduct a cost-benefit analysis for our ensemble, where it turns out that it is enough to inspect 32% of the code on the average, for detecting 76% of the defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosun et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: