Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vaccinia virus membrane biogenesis requires the A14 and A17 proteins. We show here that both proteins can associate with membranes co- but not posttranslationally, and we perform a structure function analysis of A14 and A17 using inducible recombinants. In the absence of A14, electron-dense virosomes and distinct clusters of small vesicles accumulate; in the absence of A17, small vesicles form a corona around the virosomes. When the proteins are induced at 12 h postinfection (hpi), crescents appear at the periphery of the electron-dense virosomes, with the accumulated vesicles likely contributing to their formation. A variety of mutant alleles of A14 and A17 were tested for their ability to support virion assembly. For A14, biologically important motifs within the N-terminal or central loop region affected crescent maturation and the immature virion (IV)→mature virion (MV) transition. For A17, truncation or mutation of the N terminus of A17 engendered a phenotype consistent with the N terminus of A17 recruiting the D13 scaffold protein to nascent membranes. When N-terminal processing was abrogated, virions attempted to undergo the IV-to-MV transition without removing the D13 scaffold and were therefore noninfectious and structurally aberrant. Finally, we show that A17 is phosphorylated exclusively within the C-terminal tail and that this region is a direct substrate of the viral F10 kinase. In vivo, the biological competency of A17 was reduced by mutations that prevented its serine-threonine phosphorylation and restored by phosphomimetic substitutions. Precleavage of the C terminus or abrogation of its phosphorylation diminished the IV→MV maturation; a block to cleavage spared virion maturation but compromised the yield of infectious virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unger et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: