Logistic regression is a common technique for analyzing the effect of a covariate vector x on the number of successes y in m trials when y has a binomial distribution. But at times either the logistic curve does not describe the probability of success p(x) adequately, or m is larger than 1 and y is more variable than the binomial distribution allows. Overdispersion relative to the binomial distribution is possible if the m trials in a set or “litter” are positively correlated, an important covariate is omitted, or x is measured with error. A simple way to accommodate departures from the logit link and overdispersion is to introduce a random intercept α and thus permit a random propensity toward success. When α varies between individual binary trials according to a discrete or multimodal distribution, p(x) has smooth steps and y has a binomial(m, p(x)) distribution. When the random α is constant for a set of m binary trials and varies between sets of m trials according to a discrete or multimodal distribution, p(x) has smooth steps and y is overdispersed relative to the binomial distribution. In this article the distribution of α is left unspecified and estimated by nonparametric maximum likelihood. The estimated distribution of α is discrete, so the distribution of y and all of its properties are easily estimated for any x. Two examples are considered. In the first, the logit link is inadequate, but y appears to be binomial. Hence α is allowed to vary between binary trials. In the second, y's (with m > 1) from the same design point are more dispersed than the binomial distribution would predict, and there are outliers. Allowing α to vary randomly between sets of m trials accounts for the overdispersion and seems to temper the influence of outliers on the estimated probability of success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Follmann et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: