Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyclic coordinate descent is a classic optimization method that has witnessed a resurgence of interest in signal processing, statistics, and machine learning. Reasons for this renewed interest include the simplicity, speed, and stability of the method, as well as its competitive per-formance on 1 regularized smooth optimization problems. Surprisingly, very little is known about its nonasymptotic convergence behavior on these problems. Most existing results either just prove convergence or provide asymptotic rates. We fill this gap in the literature by proving O(1/k) con-vergence rates (where k is the iteration count) for two variants of cyclic coordinate descent under an isotonicity assumption. Our analysis proceeds by comparing the objective values attained by the two variants with each other, as well as with the gradient descent algorithm. We show that the iterates generated by the cyclic coordinate descent methods remain better than those of gradient descent uniformly over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saha et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: