Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simmel says the content of experience does not make the adventure, the form does! To help clarify this remark, the Simmelian adventurer here is recast, following leads from Mead, Burke, and the pragmatists, as an ephemeral role incumbent engaged in symbolic work. The adventure is presented in terms of symbolic conversions of the content of life's experiences—physical things, social things, events, and persons—into objects of adventure. The form of experiencing engages the adventurer in symbolic work in which she or he symbolically synthesizes, antagonizes, and compromises Simmel's fundamental categories of life: certainty‐uncertainty, chance‐necessity, and passivity‐activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jules J. Wanderer (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: