The article is devoted to the consideration of the use of governance in the formation of resilience in various spheres of social life. The relevance of the work is due to the need to find institutionalized mechanisms for making mutually agreed and coordinated decisions by various actors to ensure different types of resilience. The purpose of the article is the theoretical justification of the use of various regimes of governance in the formation of resilience of various social spheres. The novelty of the article lies in the justification of the application of this management approach in ensuring resilience, adaptability and/or transformation in the restoration of the functioning of the components of society in the conditions of disasters and after their conclusion. The research methodology is based on the use of an interdisciplinary approach when considering the essential characteristics of governance. The formation of resilience is considered, in particular in the demographic, ecological spheres, state finances, labor market, improving the quality of life of the population, the development of hromadas and territories with the participation of various actors at the supranational, national, regional, local levels, as well as within households (individual level). It was found out, firstly, that different types of resilience require different regimes of governance: in real circumstances, all regimes are not applied in their “pure form”, but form certain clusters of governance approaches. Secondly, the potential benefits of governance in the formation of various types of resilience are not achieved automatically, but can be obtained, in particular, by achieving a high level of public trust in authorities, active fight against corruption, and high-quality political leadership. Based on the study of all three types of resilience, the most widespread regimes of governance with the participation of various decisionmaking actors at different territorial levels were identified. The article uses general scientific research methods: analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ROMANIUK SERHII (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: