Key result
Teneligliptin was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.00) or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.99) compared to sulfonylurea, but lowered hypoglycemia risk (HR 0.68).
Why the study?
Cardiovascular effects of DPP-4 inhibitors have been inconsistent, prompting this evaluation of major CV outcomes with teneligliptin compared to sulfonylurea in T2DM patients.
Does teneligliptin reduce the risk of major cardiovascular outcomes and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to sulfonylurea?
Cohort (n=6,682)
Does teneligliptin reduce the risk of major cardiovascular outcomes and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to sulfonylurea?
Hazard Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.85–1.19)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.02% vs 6.96%
p-value: p=0.966
In a real-world Korean cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, teneligliptin demonstrated cardiovascular safety comparable to sulfonylureas, including no increased risk of heart failure hospitalization, while significantly reducing the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
Teneligliptin shows comparable CV safety and lower hypoglycemia risk versus sulfonylurea in T2DM; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Results regarding the cardiovascular (CV) effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the effects of teneligliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on the risk of major CV outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients compared to sulfonylurea. METHODS: From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 6,682 T2DM patients who were newly prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylurea were selected and matched in a 1:1 ratio by propensity score. The hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), all-cause mortality or HHF, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hypoglycemia were assessed. RESULTS: During 641 days of follow-up, the use of teneligliptin was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.19), HHF (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.14), all-cause mortality or HHF (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.14), MI (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.20), and stroke (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.17) compared to the use of sulfonylurea. However, it was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycemia (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.94) compared to sulfonylurea therapy. CONCLUSION: Among T2DM patients, teneligliptin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of CV events including HHF, but was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to sulfonylurea therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=6,682). Teneligliptin vs. Sulfonylurea was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.19, p=0.966). Teneligliptin was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.00) or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.99) compared to sulfonylurea, but lowered hypoglycemia risk (HR 0.68).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: