This paper concerns itself with applying covariance matrix optimization algorithms to a large number of assets. A previous paper by Burgess and Bey(1988) suggests that attempting to optimize a large number of securities with the traditional covariance matrix model is not practical. An alternative approach ranks the securities with the reward-to-volatility (Reward/Beta) ratio and then optimizing a smaller subset of securities with the covariance matrix model. This study proposes additional screening methods such as stochastic dominance, reward-to-variability (R/V) ratios, reward-to-Lower Partial Moment (R/LPM) ratios, and the optimization of subgroups, and provides an empirical test of the various screening methodologies. The results indicate that the full covariance critical line optimization algorithm is surprisingly robust compared to the other techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David N. Nawrocki (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: