No AccessJournal of UrologyJU Forum1 Oct 2022Search Trends Signal Increased Vasectomy Interest in States with Sparsity of Urologists after Overrule of Roe vs. Wade Rutul D. Patel, Justin Loloi, Kevin Labagnara, and Kara L. Watts Rutul D. PatelRutul D. Patel Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York , Justin LoloiJustin Loloi Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York , Kevin LabagnaraKevin Labagnara Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York , and Kara L. WattsKara L. Watts *Correspondence: Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1250 Waters Pl., Bronx, New York 10461 telephone: 800-636-6683; email: E-mail Address: [email protected] Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002901AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1. : Evaluation of vasectomy trends in the United States. Urology 2018; 118: 76. Google Scholar 2. The New York Times: Tracking the States Where Abortion is Now Banned. The New York Times; 2022. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html. Google Scholar 3. : The correlation between google trends and salmonellosis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1575. Google Scholar 4. : What is the UK public searching for? A correlation analysis of google trends search terms and cosmetic surgery in the UK. Aesthet Plast Surg 2020; 44: 2312. Google Scholar 5. : Men Rush to Get Vasectomies After Roe Ruling. The Washington Post; 2022. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/06/29/abortion-vasectomies-roe-birth-control/. Google Scholar Submitted July 11, 2022; accepted July 22, 2022; published September 9, 2022. Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: In lieu of a formal ethics committee, the principles of the Helsinki Declaration were followed. Author Contributions: RDP, JL, KL, and KLW prepared the manuscript and figures. All authors approved the submitted manuscript. © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 208Issue 4October 2022Page: 759-761 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordslegislation and jurisprudencepractice patterns, physicians'vasectomyMetricsAuthor Information Rutul D. Patel Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York More articles by this author Justin Loloi Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York More articles by this author Kevin Labagnara Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York More articles by this author Kara L. Watts Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York *Correspondence: Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1250 Waters Pl., Bronx, New York 10461 telephone: 800-636-6683; email: E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Submitted July 11, 2022; accepted July 22, 2022; published September 9, 2022. Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: In lieu of a formal ethics committee, the principles of the Helsinki Declaration were followed. Author Contributions: RDP, JL, KL, and KLW prepared the manuscript and figures. All authors approved the submitted manuscript. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: