Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness are widely used for improvement of instruction and for administrative decision-making. Several kinds of contaminating variables may influence these ratings. Criteria for identifying such contaminants are set forth. Results of a search for extraneous, biasing variables at the high school level are reported. Of the several potential extraneous influences studied, student motivation/preference and class size meet the criteria. It is concluded that student rating forms should make provisions for adjusting for these and similar unfair influences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanna et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: