Key result
Pre-existing non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of overall mortality (HR 1.61) compared to no atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Whether the subtype of atrial fibrillation affects outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis was unclear.
Does the subtype of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, non-paroxysmal, or new-onset) affect mortality and stroke outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=2,130)
Yes
Does the subtype of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, non-paroxysmal, or new-onset) affect mortality and stroke outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Non-paroxysmal and new-onset atrial fibrillation are associated with increased mortality after TAVR for aortic stenosis, whereas paroxysmal atrial fibrillation does not confer excess mortality risk.
Non-paroxysmal AF may inform post-TAVR risk stratification; this cohort study leaves open whether subtype-targeted interventions improve outcomes.
Whether the subtype of atrial fibrillation affects outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is unclear. The nationwide FinnValve registry included 2130 patients who underwent primary after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis during 2008-2017. Altogether, 281 (13.2%) patients had pre-existing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 651 (30.6%) had pre-existing non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 160 (7.5%) were diagnosed with new-onset atrial fibrillation during the index hospitalization. The median follow-up was 2.4 (interquartile range: 1.6-3.8) years. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation did not affect 30-day or overall mortality (p-values >0.05). Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation demonstrated an increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-1.92; p<0.001), but not 30-day mortality (p = 0.084). New-onset atrial fibrillation demonstrated significantly increased 30-day mortality (hazard ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-6.09; p = 0.010) and overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-2.19; p<0.001). The incidence of early or late stroke did not differ between atrial fibrillation subtypes (p-values >0.05). In conclusion, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and new-onset atrial fibrillation are associated with increased mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, whereas paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has no effect on mortality. These findings suggest that non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation rather than paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may be associated with structural cardiac damage which is of prognostic significance in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaakkola et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=2,130). Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on All-cause overall mortality (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.92, p=<0.001). Pre-existing non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of overall mortality (HR 1.61) compared to no atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: