This study is a cross‐cultural comparison of the work–family interface for married women using two nationally representative samples from S ingapore ( n = 467) and the U nited S tates of A merica ( n = 923). This study demonstrates how the direction and strength of paths in a model of the work–family interface differs between a collectivist nation ( S ingapore) and an individualistic nation (the USA ). Results revealed that schedule flexibility decreased family‐to‐work conflict in the United States but increased family‐to‐work conflict and increased depression in S ingapore. Clear differences in the direction of effects in schedule flexibility and family‐to‐work conflict in the United States and S ingapore suggest that national culture (e.g. collectivist vs individualistic) is an important factor in theorizing about the work–family interface for married women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fackrell et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: