Key result
Abciximab did not significantly reduce the risk of major cardiac events at 1 month (RR 0.93) or 1 year compared to control in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with thienopyridine loading.
Why the study?
Does abciximab reduce MACEs in diabetic patients undergoing PCI with thienopyridine loading?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,607)
Does abciximab reduce MACEs in diabetic patients undergoing PCI with thienopyridine loading?
Relative Risk: 0.93 (95% CI 0.6–1.44)
p-value: p=0.75
Concomitant dosing of abciximab and thienopyridines provides no additional benefit and may increase minor bleeding among diabetic patients undergoing PCI.
Abciximab adds no MACE benefit and may increase bleeding in diabetic PCI with thienopyridines; confirms no additive role and supports avoiding routine use.
BACKGROUND: It has been controversial whether abciximab offered additional benefits for diabetic patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with thienopyridines loading. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library clinical trials registry, ISI Science Citation Index, ISI Web of Knowledge and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched, supplemented with manual-screening for relevant publications. Quantitative meta-analyses were performed to assess differences between abciximab groups and controls with respect to post-PCI risk of major cardiac events (MACEs), angiographic restenosis and bleeding complications. RESULTS: 9 trials were identified, involving 2,607 diabetic patients receiving PCI for coronary artery diseases. Among those patients who underwent elective PCI or primary PCI, pooling results showed that abciximab did not significantly reduce risks of MACEs (for elective-PCI patients: RR(1-month): 0.93, 95% CI: 0.60-1.44; RR(1-year): 0.95, 95% CI: 0.81-1.11; for primary-PCI patients: RR(1-month): 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70-1.57; RR(1-year): 0.98, 95% CI: 0.80-1.21), nor all-cause mortality, re-infarction and angiographic restenosis in either group. The only beneficial effect by abciximab appeared to be a decrease 1-year TLR (target lesion revascularization) risk in elective-PCI patients (RR1-year: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99). Moreover, occurrence of minor bleeding complications increased in elective-PCI patients treated with abciximab (RR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.68-5.13, P<0.001), whereas major bleedings rate was similar (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.27-2.57). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant dosing of abciximab and thienopyridines provides no additional benefit among diabetic patients who underwent PCI; this conclusion, though, needs further confirmation in larger studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease in diabetic patients (n=2,607). Abciximab vs. Placebo or inactive control was evaluated on 1-month major cardiac events (MACEs) in elective-PCI patients (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60-1.44, p=0.75). Abciximab did not significantly reduce the risk of major cardiac events at 1 month (RR 0.93) or 1 year compared to control in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with thienopyridine loading.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: