Many explanations in physics rely on idealized models of physical systems. These explanations fail to satisfy the conditions of standard accounts of explanation. Recently, some philosophers have claimed that idealizations can be used to underwrite explanation nonetheless but only when they are what have variously been called representational, Galilean, controllable, or harmless idealizations. This article argues that such a half-measure is untenable and that idealizations not of this sort can have explanatory capacities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Wayne (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: