Key result
Weight loss cuts intra-abdominal fat ~33%, tracking with cardiometabolic risk factor improvements.
Why the study?
Does a weight reduction program improve intra-abdominal fat and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents with extreme obesity?
Cohort (n=107)
No
Does a weight reduction program improve intra-abdominal fat and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents with extreme obesity?
Intra-abdominal fat assessed by ultrasound is a practical marker that correlates well with cardiometabolic risk and reflects treatment success in severely obese adolescents.
Sonographic intra-abdominal fat may track cardiometabolic response to weight loss in obese adolescents; extends prior observations but leaves causal inference open.
OBJECTIVE: The metabolic and cardiovascular risk of obesity is predominantly defined through the amount of intra-abdominal fat (IAF). Regarding this risk and the benefits of weight reduction gender-specific differences have been described. The aim of this study was to examine the gender-specific relationship between IAF assessed via ultrasound and the cardiometabolic risk profile in extremely obese adolescents before and after weight loss. METHODS: In 107 consecutively admitted adolescents (n = 59 girls, mean age 15.4 ± 2.6 years boys and 15.1 ± 2.1 years girls, mean BMI z-score 3.2 ± 0.6 boys and 3.5 ± 0.6 girls) anthropometric and fasting laboratory chemical parameters were measured before and after an in-patient long-term therapy (mean durance 5.6 ± 2.3 months). IAF was determined by measuring the intra-abdominal depth (IAD) via ultrasound. RESULTS: IAD was higher in boys as compared to girls (58.0 ± 22.4 mm vs. 51.3 ± 16.0 mm). IAD values were positively associated with BMI-z scores, waist circumferences, HOMA-IR and serum levels of x03B3;GT, hs-CRP and IL-6 in both genders. In boys, but not in girls, IAD was significantly correlated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum levels of triglycerides, ALT as well as adiponectin and HDL-cholesterol. After a marked mean weight loss of -27.1 ± 16.2 kg (-20.1 ± 7.9%) in boys and of -20.5 ± 11.5 kg (-17.3 ± 7.1%) in girls, IAD decreased by -20.7 ± 16.2 mm (--32.4 ± 16.9%) in boys and by -18.4 ± 12,7 mm (-34.3 ± 18.4%) in girls, resulting in more pronounced ameliorations of cardiovascular risk factors in boys than in girls. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that IAF assessed by ultrasound is a good indicator for the cardiometabolic risk factor profile in extremely obese adolescents. Associations between IAF and risk factors are more pronounced in boys than in girls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moß et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Extreme obesity (n=107). In-patient weight reduction program vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Change in sonographically assessed intra-abdominal depth (IAD) and its correlation with cardiometabolic risk factors (Decreased by 20.7 mm (-32.4%) in boys and 18.4 mm (-34.3%) in girls, p=<0.05). Sonographically assessed intra-abdominal fat significantly decreased after weight loss, and changes correlated closely with cardiometabolic risk factor improvements, more prominently in boys than in girls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: