Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An user intervention based advanced technique for the detection and elimination of cracks in digitized paintings and images is proposed in this paper. Usually cracks degrade the quality of painting as well as authenticity of painting becomes questionable. In the proposed method the cracks are detected by thresholding the result of the morphological top-hat transform. Further, misidentified cracks are detected either by involving user intervention or by using a semi-automatic procedure based on region growing technique. Finally, crack interpolation also called crack filling is performed using order statistics filters so as to restore the cracked image. The true positive rate and false positive rate are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed technique. We collected 2000 paintings & images classified as cracked and uncracked online digital art database for experimental purpose. The result shows achievement of true positive rate of about 98.3% at the rate of 0.1 false positive per image. This is because of providing user intervention during module called identifying mis-identified cracks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: