Ratings obtained from subjective tests indicate that for single encodings of speech, near equivalence to 64 kb/s PCM is obtained at 32 kb/s with ADPCM/AP and SBC, and at 24 kb/s with APC and ATC/VD. Tandem encodings of 32 kb/s ADPCM/AP are significantly better than 16 kb/s APC and SEC. Eight synchronous encodings of 32 kb/s ADPCM/AP are rated about the same as eight asynchronous encodings of 64 kb/s PCM. The subjective test results are used to develop preliminary coder performance functions in terms of Q (subjective ratio of speech power and speech-dependent noise power) in terms consistent with a previously reported quantization distortion opinion model. These relations, in conjunction with a proposed CCITT planning rule, indicate that a 32 kb/s ADPCM/AP coder can be allowed in each of the national extensions of an international connection. Reported results apply only to coder quantization effects on speech quality; other signals (e.g., voiceband data, signaling tones) and impact of coder delay on echo performance are not covered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daumer et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: