Key result
The US practice setting was associated with a significantly longer excess hospital length of stay for postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to Europe after CABG (3.4 vs. 0.8 days, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Postoperative atrial fibrillation causes excess hospital length of stay and costs, but validated data on geographic variations in its impact, particularly outside the US and Europe, have been limited.
Does geographic location (US vs. Europe) affect the excess hospital length of stay associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review
Yes
Does geographic location (US vs. Europe) affect the excess hospital length of stay associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: 325% longer
Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
There is significant geographic variation in POAF-related excess hospital length of stay, with the US demonstrating longer excess stays compared to Europe for both CABG and lung resections.
US excess LOS for POAF after CABG signals need for care standardization; extends evidence of geographic variation in cardiac surgical outcomes.
Aim: In the US, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery and a frequent complication after non-cardiac surgery, causing excess patient length of stay and costs. After a comprehensive review looking for validated statistically significant data sets, too few data, particularly from outside of the US and Europe, could be found to perform a conclusive analysis, but there is enough data for a well-informed, educated opinion. Methods: A systematic review analyzing 28 international and US studies of POAF hospital length of stay were identified; from this excess and % excess along with total patient length of stay were calculated, where excess patient length of stay is defined as the difference in post-operative stay between POAF and non-POAF patients in days. Geographic variabilities were calculated using chi-square analyses for US regions and international comparisons for a variety of surgical procedures with POAF. Results: Geographic variability analyses when corrected for total hospital stay showed a 325% longer excess patient length of stay (days) in the US vs. Europe (3.4 days vs. 0.8 days) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It also showed a 27.3% longer excess patient length of stay (days) in the US vs. Europe (4.2 days vs. 3.3 days) for lung resections. These were both statistically significant at P < 0.001. Conclusion: There appear to be substantial variations in POAF-related care practices worldwide. In all practice settings, POAF causes increased patient length of stay. Europeans appear to do better than the US in POAF patients’ length of stay for CABG but not for lung resections. POAF is a worldwide problem where international cooperation in research and development of best practice guidelines would be particularly fruitful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pardo et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). United States practice setting vs. European practice setting was evaluated on Excess patient length of stay (days) for CABG (325% longer, p=<0.001). The US practice setting was associated with a significantly longer excess hospital length of stay for postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to Europe after CABG (3.4 vs. 0.8 days, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: