Key result
A parallel classification architecture and majority vote system based on PA-EEG characteristics successfully determined patient prognosis with an 81.94% success rate.
Why the study?
Does a parallel classification architecture and majority vote system accurately classify patient prognosis based on PA-EEG activity?
Does a parallel classification architecture and majority vote system accurately classify patient prognosis based on PA-EEG activity?
A parallel classification architecture and majority vote system can classify patient prognosis based on PA-EEG activity with an 81.94% success rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid EEG-based prognosis assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Periodic activity in electroencephalography (PA-EEG) is shown as comprising a series of repetitive wave patterns that may appear in different cerebral regions and are due to many different pathologies. The diagnosis based on PA-EEG is an arduous task for experts in Clinical Neurophysiology, being mainly based on other clinical features of patients. Considering this difficulty in the diagnosis it is also very complicated to establish the prognosis of patients who present PA-EEG. The goal of this paper is to propose a method capable of determining patient prognosis based on characteristics of the PA-EEG activity. The approach, based on a parallel classification architecture and a majority vote system has proven successful by obtaining a success rate of 81.94% in the classification of patient prognosis of our database.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez-González et al. (2015) studied Periodic activity in electroencephalography (PA-EEG). Parallel classification architecture and majority vote system was evaluated on Classification of patient prognosis. A parallel classification architecture and majority vote system based on PA-EEG characteristics successfully determined patient prognosis with an 81.94% success rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: