Key result
Heart rate reduction with atenolol or UL-FS 49 improved exercise-induced regional ischaemic function and subendocardial perfusion in dogs with coronary stenosis.
Why the study?
Does heart rate reduction with atenolol or UL-FS 49 improve exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and contractile dysfunction in dogs with coronary artery stenosis?
Does heart rate reduction with atenolol or UL-FS 49 improve exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and contractile dysfunction in dogs with coronary artery stenosis?
Heart rate reduction is the primary mechanism by which atenolol improves exercise-induced myocardial ischemia, whereas the bradycardic agent UL-FS 49 provides improvements in systolic wall thickening that are not entirely eliminated by matching the control heart rate.
Heart rate reduction may aid ischemic function in canine models; leaves open translation to human coronary disease.
The role of bradycardia in reducing exercise-induced ischaemia and wall dysfunction was examined in dogs with single vessel chronic coronary artery stenosis created using an ameroid constrictor. Treadmill exercise produced significant regional myocardial ischaemia (blood flow measured using microspheres) and contractile dysfunction (systolic wall thickening measured with sonomicrometers). Dogs were initially studied during a control run before and during a second identical run after administration of the cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocker atenolol, which improved regional ischaemic function from 4.4 +/- 3.7% to 8.5 +/- 2.8% and subendocardial perfusion from 0.43 +/- 0.23 to 0.55 +/- 0.29 ml min-1 g-1. In another group of dogs during a run with atenolol, the heart rate was paced to match the rate observed in the control run. During the atenolol run with pacing, all beneficial effects of atenolol observed at the reduced exercise heart rate were lost. A third group of dogs received the bradycardic agent UL-FS 49 (1.0 mg kg-1, i.v.) prior to exercise. UL-FS 49 produced a heart rate reduction during exercise from 230 +/- 19 to 139 +/- 10 beats min-1; this was associated with an increase in systolic wall thickening from 9.3 +/- 5.0% (during the control run) to 21.5 +/- 8.4%, thereby eliminating the exercise-induced contractile dysfunction. Transmural myocardial blood flow per beat to the poststenotic myocardium was improved significantly from 4.8 X 10(-3) +/- 1.9 X 10(-3) ml beat-1 to 9.8 X 10(-3) +/- 1.7 X 10(-3). Atrial pacing to match heart rate to the control exercise rate during the UL-FS 49 run did not eliminate all of the improvement in systolic wall thickening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guth et al. (1987) studied Exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia. Heart rate reduction (atenolol or UL-FS 49) vs. Control run (no drug) was evaluated on Regional ischaemic function (systolic wall thickening) and subendocardial perfusion. Heart rate reduction with atenolol or UL-FS 49 improved exercise-induced regional ischaemic function and subendocardial perfusion in dogs with coronary stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: