Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The purpose of this narrative review is to critically appraise recent advances in sports injury rehabilitation—primarily focusing on biopsychosocial (BPS) approaches alongside emerging technological innovations—and identify current gaps and future directions. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for the years 2018–2024. Eligible records were English-language, human studies comprising systematic reviews, clinical trials, and translational investigations on wearable sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), regenerative therapies (platelet-rich plasma PRP, bone marrow aspirate concentrate BMAC, stem cells, and prolotherapy), and BPS rehabilitation models; single-patient case reports, editorials, and non-scholarly sources were excluded. The synthesis yielded four themes: (1) BPS implementation remains underutilised owing to a lack of validated tools, variable provider readiness, and system-level barriers; (2) wearables and AI can enhance real-time monitoring and risk stratification but are limited by data heterogeneity, non-standardised pipelines, and sparse external validation; (3) VR/gamification improves engagement and task-specific practice, but evidence is dominated by pilot or laboratory studies with scarce longitudinal follow-up data; and (4) regenerative interventions show mechanistic promise, but conclusions are constrained by methodological variability and regulatory hurdles. Conclusions: BPS perspectives and emerging technologies have genuine potential to improve outcomes, but translation to practice hinges on (1) pragmatic or hybrid effectiveness–implementation trials, (2) standardisation of data and intervention protocols (including core outcome sets and effect-size reporting), and (3) integration of psychological and social assessment into routine pathways supported by provider training and interoperable digital capture.
Peter Takáč (Sat,) studied this question.