PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1997Language Testing184 citations

Washback, impact and validity: ethical concerns

View Full Paper
LHLiz Hamp‐Lyons

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

For many years it was asserted that language tests had a negative impact on teach ing and thereby on learning/learners. This impact has become widely known in language testing as 'washback' ('backwash'). A theory of washback is emerging and its domain being delineated; in this article the theory of washback is linked with the broader concept of 'impact' in educational measurement, and thence to the recent debate on construct validity associated with Messick.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liz Hamp‐Lyons (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a218201c9834130fef1aae5https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact and Washback in Language Testing1997 · 108 citations
  2. 2The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning.1984 · 522 citations
  3. 3On taking language tests1984 · 156 citations
  4. 4TESTING AND INSTRUCTION: LINKS AND DISTINCTIONS1983 · 54 citations
  5. 5The Merits of Measurement-Driven Instruction.1987 · 223 citations