Cross-sectional survey examines antibiotic practices among prescribers and farmers, highlighting knowledge gaps.
OBJECTIVES: This study employed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) to investigate antibiotic usage in ruminants and chickens farming by various prescribers and farmers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across 64 sub-districts in eight divisions of Bangladesh, assessing the KAP concerning antibiotic use (ABU) and antibiotic resistance (ABR) through a pretested questionnaire. A total of 1248 participants took part in the KAP survey. Data collection methods included face-to-face interactions, email, and courier services, followed by subsequent analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed that registered veterinarians achieved a 100% knowledge score regarding recommended doses and standard practices. While farmers and informal practitioners generally agreed with some antibiotic practices, 10.71% recognized the importance of withdrawal periods, 11.07% acknowledged public health risks, and 5.71% understood the residual effects of antibiotics. Similarly, among informal practitioners, awareness was low, with only 14.46%, 16.75%, and 7.71%, respectively. These findings show that many farmers and informal practitioners have limited KAP regarding antibiotic use and resistance. The analysis showed that demographic factors, such as education had a significant impact on participants' KAP (OR = 8.06; 95% CI: 6.07-10.70; P < 0.001) regarding ABU and ABR. In particular, registered veterinarians were nearly three times more likely to have accurate KAP compared to those with lower education levels (aOR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.94-4.00; P < 0.001). Importantly, the correlation matrix indicated strong and statistically significant positive relationships among knowledge, attitudes, and practices (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate a strong interplay between knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ABU and ABR in ruminants and chickens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: