Key result
Pressure overload induced significant cardiac fibrosis and worse exercise intolerance compared to volume overload, driven by distinct gene expression profiles involving cytoskeletal pathways.
Why the study?
Does pressure overload versus volume overload differentially affect transcriptome profiles and exercise capacity in a rat model of cardiac remodeling?
Does pressure overload versus volume overload differentially affect transcriptome profiles and exercise capacity in a rat model of cardiac remodeling?
Absolute Event Rate: 434% vs 497.8%
p-value: p=<0.05
Pressure overload, but not volume overload, induces cardiac fibrosis and exercise intolerance in rats, with distinct transcriptional profiles.
We compared the gene expression profiles in the hypertrophied myocardium of rats subjected to pressure overload (PO) and volume overload (VO) using DNA chip technology, and compared the effects on exercise capacity with a treadmill test. METHODS: Constriction of the abdominal aorta or mitral regurgitation induced by a hole in the mitral leaflet were used to induce PO (n = 19), VO (n = 16) or PO + VO (n = 20) in rats. Serial echocardiographic studies and exercise were performed at 2-week intervals, and invasive hemodynamic examination by a pressure-volume catheter system was performed 12 weeks after the procedure. The gene expression profiles of the left ventricle (LV) 12 weeks after the procedure were analyzed by DNA chip technology. RESULTS: In hemodynamic analyses, the LV end-diastolic pressure and the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship slope were greater in the PO group than in the VO group. When we compared LV remodeling and exercise capacity, cardiac fibrosis and exercise intolerance developed in the PO group but not in the VO group (exercise duration, 434.0 80.3 vs. 497.8 49.0 seconds, p < 0.05, respectively). Transcriptional profiling of cardiac apical tissues revealed that gene expression related to the inflammatory response and cellular signaling pathways were significantly enriched in the VO group, whereas cardiac fibrosis, cytoskeletal pathway and G-protein signaling genes were enriched in the PO group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that many genes were regulated in PO, VO or both, and that there were different regulation patterns by cardiac remodeling. Cardiac fibrosis and cytoskeletal pathway were important pathways in the PO group and influenced exercise capacity. Cardiac fibrosis influences exercise capacity before LV function is reduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) studied Cardiac remodeling (n=69). Pressure overload vs. Volume overload was evaluated on Exercise duration (seconds) (p=<0.05). Pressure overload induced significant cardiac fibrosis and worse exercise intolerance compared to volume overload, driven by distinct gene expression profiles involving cytoskeletal pathways.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: