Why the study?
What is the long-term outcome of medical treatment in Japanese patients with double-vessel coronary artery disease?
What is the long-term outcome of medical treatment in Japanese patients with double-vessel coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Medical treatment for double-vessel coronary artery disease yields relatively good long-term survival, though patients with prior myocardial infarction and impaired left ventricular function (EF ≤40%) have worse outcomes and may benefit from revascularization.
The long-term (average: 10 years) outcome in 220 patients with double-vessel disease (DVD) treated medically was investigated. The patients underwent coronary angiography between September 1973 and February 1984, and significant (75% or more) stenosis was detected in each of two major coronary arteries. These patients showed relatively good 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 94.5% and 87.4%, respectively. Cardiac death occurred in 31 patients (14.1%) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) developed in 16 patients (7.3%) during follow-up. When these were defined as cardiac events, the annual attrition rate was 3.1%. A comparison of the outcome with regard to the presence or absence of MI revealed worse results for the MI group, but no difference was observed between different sites of infarction. There was also no difference in outcome with regard to the presence or absence of lesions in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). In the MI group, patients with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < or = 40%) had inferior survival to those with good left ventricular function. Thus, DVD associated with good left ventricular function had a relatively good outcome when treated medically, while patients with impaired left ventricular function might benefit from revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishiyama et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: