Monitoring the use of lipid-lowering medication among persons with newly diagnosed diabetes: a nationwide register-based study

OBJECTIVES: To develop a register-based monitoring system to provide information on the use of lipid-lowering medication among persons with diabetes in different patient groups and by socioeconomic position. DESIGN: Longitudinal and register-based, before and after diabetes diagnosis. SETTING: Finnish population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 121 053 persons aged 30-79 years with a new diagnosis of diabetes during 2000-2006. The annual cohorts were divided at the time of diabetes diagnosis by coronary heart disease (CHD) status. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Lipid-lowering medication purchases after diabetes diagnosis and prior to the diagnosis. RESULTS: According to the health insurance reimbursement data the use of lipid-lowering medication advanced rapidly among people with diabetes in the early 2000s in Finland. Of the patients diagnosed with diabetes in 2000 only one-fourth used lipid-lowering medication in 6-12 months after their diagnosis. For those diagnosed in 2006, the utilization rate was 46%. Among those with a history of CHD the use of medication was markedly higher; 51-58% in 2000 and 77-79% in 2006. Taking into account the increasing trend and measuring the independent effect of the diagnosis of diabetes on lipid-lowering medication, setting the diagnosis increased the use by 10-50%. Despite increasing overall utilisation rates, socioeconomic difference in the use of lipid-lowering medication remained throughout the study period. In particular, the lowest income quintile differed from other income groups and in 2006 its use of lipid-lowering medication remained approximately 10% points lower compared with the overall level. CONCLUSIONS: The lipid-lowering medication is being applied in an increasing population of new diabetes cases; however, modelling the independent effect of the diagnosis of diabetes on lipid-lowering medication shows that the diagnosis increased use, but did not abolish socioeconomic differences.