This randomized control trial study was aimed to compare the effect of cognitive-behavioral counseling and strengths-based counseling models towards the resilience students. The 99 students participants of the study were assigned randomly into three different conditions as follows; 32 students in cognitive-behavioral counseling group; 33 students in the strengths-based counseling group; and 34 students as the waiting-list control. The data was gathered by using the 14 items of the psychological resilience scale. The data of the study was analyzed using RM-ANCOVA. The results of the study indicated that: (1) there are statistically significant of enhancing the resilience of both participants in cognitive-behavioral counseling and strengths-based counseling group, and (2) the resilience of the students in the cognitive-behavioral counseling group is significantly higher than students in the strengths-based counseling group or in the waiting-list control group. The conclusion is that the cognitive-behavioral counseling is more effective than the strengths-based counseling model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suranata et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: