Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Thispaperconsiderstheproblemofrelativepositioncontrolformultiplespacecraftformatione ying.Specie cally, the full nonlinear dynamics describing the relative positioning of multiple spacecraft formation e ying are used to develop a Lyapunov-based, nonlinear, adaptive control law that guarantees global asymptotic convergence of the position tracking error in the presence of unknown, constant, or slow-varying spacecraft masses, disturbance forces, and gravity forces. Simulation results are included to illustrate the controller performance. that compensated for unknown, constant disturbances while pro- ducing globally asymptotically decaying position tracking errors. This controller, however, required exact knowledge of the space- craft parameters. In this paper we consider the full nonlinear dynamics describ- ing the relative positioning of MSFF for control design purposes. Using Lyapunov-based control design and stability analysis tech- niques, we develop a nonlinear adaptive control law that guarantees global asymptotic convergence of the spacecraft relative position to any sufe ciently smooth desired trajectory, despite the presence of unknown, constant, or slow-varying spacecraft masses, disturbance forces, and gravity forces. In the case when the parameters are ex- actlyknown,theproposedcontrolstrategyyieldsglobalexponential convergence of the tracking errors. In comparison to the work of Refs. 11 and 12, the proposed controller ensures stronger stability resultsandaccountsforawiderclassofparametricuncertainties.As inRefs.11-13, we will consider in this paper the idealized scenario where the spacecraft actuators are capable of providing continuous- time control efforts, as opposed to being of pulse type. 9 We note that the problem of pulse-type, nonlinear control design for MSFF constitutes an open research problem and is beyond the scope of this paper. The paper is organized as follows. Section II presents the non- linear dynamic model derivation. The control objective is stated in Sec. III. The control design and closed-loop stability analysis are presented in Sec. IV. Simulation results are provided in Sec. V, whereas some concluding remarks are given in Sec. VI.
Queiroz et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: