Background: Increased endothelial permeability of pulmonary vessels is a primary pathological characteristic of septic acute lung injury (ALI). Previously, elevated lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) levels and LPA 2 (an LPA receptor) expression have been found in the peripheral blood and lungs of septic mice, respectively. However, the specific role of LPA 2 in septic ALI remains unclear. Methods: A lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced model of sepsis was established in wild-type (WT) and global LPA 2 knockout ( Lpar2 −/− ) mice. We examined mortality, lung injury, assessed endothelial permeability through Evans blue dye (EBD) assay in vivo, and transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) of mouse lung microvascular endothelial cells (MLMECs) in vitro. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), histopathological, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot were employed to investigate the role of LPA 2 in septic ALI. Results: Lpar2 deficiency increased vascular endothelial permeability, impaired lung injury, and increased mortality. Histological examination revealed aggravated inflammation, edema, hemorrhage and alveolar septal thickening in the lungs of septic Lpar2 −/− mice. In vitro , loss of Lpar2 resulted in increased permeability of MLMECs. Pharmacological activation of LPA 2 by the agonist DBIBB led to significantly reduced inflammation, edema and hemorrhage, as well as increased expression of the vascular endothelial tight junction (TJ) protein zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and claudin-5, as well as the adheren junction (AJ) protein VE-cadherin. Moreover, DBIBB treatment was found to alleviate mortality by protecting against vascular endothelial permeability. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that vascular endothelial permeability was alleviated through LPA-LPA 2 signaling via the PLC-PKC-FAK pathway. Conclusion: These data provide a novel mechanism of endothelial barrier protection via PLC-PKC-FAK pathway and suggest that LPA 2 may contribute to the therapeutic effects of septic ALI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: