Knowledge ascriptions are contrast‐sensitive. One natural explanation for this is that the knowledge relation is contrastive (s knows that p rather than q). But can the binary view of knowledge (s knows that p) explain contrast‐sensitivity? I review some of the linguistic data supporting contrast‐sensitivity, and critique the three main binary explanations for contrast‐sensitivity. I conclude that the contrast‐sensitivity of knowledge ascriptions shows that knowledge is a contrastive relation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Schaffer (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: