Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article assesses a postcolonial critique of Emmanuel Levinas’ thought. Levinas’ work has recently been accused of Eurocentrism, racism and xenophobia; those accusations are supported by recorded interviews, which at times voice bigoted and xenophobic remarks. What postcolonial critics suggest is that these remarks are made possible by Levinas’ philosophical commitments to phenomenology and Europe as an intellectual process. The article gives an assessment of the postcolonial critique and argues that the critique is necessitous but incomplete and extends a uniformity thesis that carries with it a set of questionable assumptions regarding the connection of philosophy and historical narratives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louis Blond (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: