Qualitative study examines accessibility and acceptability of a digital intervention for people with aphasia, highlighting design considerations.
ABSTRACTBackground Behavioural Activation (BA) is a mental health treatment that encourages a person to develop or re-engage in activities that are pleasurable and meaningful to them. It is important to consider the ways such interventions can be made accessible and acceptable to individuals with communication disabilities like aphasia after stroke. Digital technologies may provide a scalable approach to increasing dissemination of BA to this population.Aims The aim of this study was to examine the communicative accessibility and prospective acceptability of a digital BA intervention developed for this population.Methods & Procedures A qualitative research design was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 11 people with aphasia caused by stroke. Data were subject to qualitative content analysis.Outcomes & Results The results suggest that participants found the developed intervention to be both overall accessible and acceptable. Participants suggested improvements that highlighted the importance of considering how an individual's psychosocial and cognitive experience of stroke aphasia may influence their preferences for intervention layout and content.Conclusions Results of our study reiterated the importance of a user-centred design process to ensure the accessibility and acceptability of digital interventions. This work provides the foundation for ongoing design of the intervention. The continued development may also provide a framework for future development of accessible and acceptable digital interventions not only for those living with aphasia after stroke but others living with acquired language or cognitive disabilities.KEYWORDS: AphasiaDigital InterventionBehavioural ActivationCommunicative AccessibilityAcceptability AcknowledgementThe researchers are grateful to the participants who generously contributed their time.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [IK]. The data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.Supplementary InformationSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2023.2244166
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: