It is widely believed that unlabeled data are promising for improving prediction accuracy in classification problems. Although theoretical studies about when/how unlabeled data are beneficial exist, an actual prediction improvement has not been sufficiently investigated for a finite sample in a systematic manner. We investigate the impact of unlabeled data in linear discriminant analysis and compare the error rates of the classifiers estimated with/without unlabeled data. Our focus is a labeling mechanism that characterizes the probabilistic structure of occurrence of labeled cases. Results imply that an extremely small proportion of unlabeled data has a large effect on the analysis results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: