Key result
The introduction of ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays requires the development and validation of new diagnostic algorithms and assay-specific cut-offs to avoid increased false positive rates.
Why the study?
How do ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays impact diagnostic algorithms for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
How do ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays impact diagnostic algorithms for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
The transition to ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin assays necessitates the validation of new, assay-specific diagnostic algorithms for the early evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Ultra-sensitive troponin assays warrant caution in suspected ACS until assay-specific cut-offs validated; leaves open optimal algorithms for prospective studies.
The measurement of cardiac troponins, either cardiac troponin I or T, has become the culprit of clinical decision making in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially in those with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The leading analytical mainstays of cardiac troponin immunoassays include the limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), functional sensitivity, the 99 th percentile of a healthy reference population, along with the percentage of "ostensibly healthy" subjects displaying measurable values < 99 th percentile. The latest generation of cardiac troponin immunoassays, conventionally defined as "high-sensitive" (HS), is characterized by a LoD over 100-fold lower compared to the first commercialized techniques and a percentage of measurable values consistently > 50% in the general healthy population. The very recent commercialization of methods with further improved analytical sensitivity (i.e., "ultra-sensitive" assays), which allow to measure cardiac troponin values in the vast majority of healthy subjects, is now challenging the diagnostic paradigm based on early rule-out of subjects with cardiac troponin values comprised between the 99 th percentile and LoD. New diagnostic strategies, entailing assay-specific cut-offs, must hence be developed and validated in large multicenter studies. The aim of this article is to provide an update on commercially available HS and "ultra"-sensitive techniques for measuring cardiac troponins, along with possible implications of increasingly enhanced analytical sensitivity on diagnostic algorithms for evaluating patients with suspected ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lippi et al. (2018) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome. Ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays vs. Contemporary or high-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays was evaluated. The introduction of ultra-sensitive cardiac troponin immunoassays requires the development and validation of new diagnostic algorithms and assay-specific cut-offs to avoid increased false positive rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: