Key result
The addition of copeptin to hs-cTnT did not increase diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting within 2 hours of symptom onset (AUC 0.86 vs 0.87; p=NS).
Why the study?
Does the addition of copeptin to hs-cTnT improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting within 2 hours of symptom onset?
Observational (n=519)
Blinded
Yes
Does the addition of copeptin to hs-cTnT improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting within 2 hours of symptom onset?
Routine use of copeptin in addition to hs-cTnT for early presenters with suspected acute myocardial infarction does not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and is not warranted.
Does not support copeptin addition for early presenters; leaves open its role in later presenters or refined algorithms.
BACKGROUND: Patients presenting very early after chest pain onset may provide a diagnostic challenge even when using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT). We hypothesized that in these patients the incremental value of copeptin in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be substantial. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the incremental value of copeptin in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department within 2 hours of symptom onset in a multicenter study. Copeptin was measured in a blinded fashion. Two independent cardiologists adjudicated the final diagnosis using all available clinical informations, including high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). RESULTS: Overall, 2000 patients were enrolled, of whom 519 (26%) arrived within 2 hours of symptom onset. Of these, 102 patients (20%) had an AMI. The additional use of copeptin did not increase diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of hs-cTnT (0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.90) for hs-cTnT alone to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90) for the combination; p = NS). Copeptin (using 9 pmol/L as a cut-off) increased the negative predictive value (NPV) of hs-cTnT (using 14 ng/L as a cut-off) alone from 93% (95% CI: 90-95%) to 96% (95% CI: 93-98%). The NPV for the combination of hs-cTnT and copeptin was lower in patients arriving in the first 2 hours than in those arriving after 2 hours: 96% (95% CI: 93-98%) versus 99% (95% CI: 99-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of copeptin on top of hs-cTnT seems to lead to a small increase in NPV, but no increase in AUC. Routine use of copeptin in early presenters does not seem warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stallone et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=519). Copeptin addition to hs-cTnT vs. hs-cTnT alone was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction (AUC) (95% CI 0.82-0.90, p=NS). The addition of copeptin to hs-cTnT did not increase diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting within 2 hours of symptom onset (AUC 0.86 vs 0.87; p=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: