Key result
A community health worker intervention providing post-discharge support did not significantly reduce hospital readmission rates compared with usual care (15.4% vs 17.9%).
Why the study?
Does a community health worker intervention reduce hospital readmissions in high-risk medical patients discharged to home?
RCT (n=423)
Patient-level
Yes
Does a community health worker intervention reduce hospital readmissions in high-risk medical patients discharged to home?
Absolute Event Rate: 15.4% vs 17.9%
p-value: p=not statistically significant
A pilot community health worker intervention demonstrated feasibility and a non-significant trend toward reduced hospital readmissions among vulnerable medical patients.
Does not support adoption of community health worker post-discharge support; challenges positive signals from prior pilot data.
OBJECTIVE: To pilot-test the feasibility and preliminary effect of a community health worker (CHW) intervention to reduce hospital readmissions. DESIGN: Patient-level randomized quality improvement intervention. SETTING: An academic medical center serving a predominantly low-income population in the Boston, Massachusetts area and 10 affiliated primary care practices. PARTICIPANTS: Medical service patients with an in-network primary care physician who were discharged to home (n = 423) and had one of five risk factors for readmission within 30 days. INTERVENTION: Inpatient introductory visit and weekly post-discharge telephonic support for 4 weeks to assist patient in coordinating medical visits, obtaining and using medications, and in self-management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of completed CHW contacts; CHW-reported barriers and facilitators to assisting patients; primary care, emergency department and inpatient care use. RESULTS: Roughly 70% of patients received at least one post-discharge CHW call; only 38% of patients received at least four calls as intended. Hospital readmission rates were lower among CHW patients (15.4%) compared with usual care (17.9%); the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Under performance-based payment systems, identifying cost-effective solutions for reducing hospital readmissions will be crucial to the economic survival of all hospitals, especially safety-net systems. This pilot study suggests that with appropriate supportive infrastructure, hospital-based CHWs may represent a feasible strategy for improving transitional care among vulnerable populations. An ongoing, randomized, controlled trial of a CHW intervention, developed according to the lessons of this pilot, will provide further insight into the utility of this approach to reducing readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burns et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Risk of hospital readmission (n=423). Community health worker (CHW) intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Hospital readmission rates (p=not statistically significant). A community health worker intervention providing post-discharge support did not significantly reduce hospital readmission rates compared with usual care (15.4% vs 17.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: