Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report an 11.4%-efficient perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 solar cell using low-cost molybdenum oxide/aluminum (i.e., MoOx/Al) as an alternative top contact to replace noble/precious metals (e.g., Au or Ag) for extracting photogenerated holes. The device performance of perovskite solar cells using a MoOx/Al top contact is comparable to that of cells using the standard Ag top contact. Analysis of impedance spectroscopy measurements suggests that using 10-nm-thick MoOx and Al does not affect charge-recombination properties of perovskite solar cells. Using a thicker (20-nm) MoOx layer leads to a lower cell performance caused mainly by a reduced fill factor. Our results suggest that MoOx/Al is promising as a low-cost and effective hole-extraction contact for perovskite solar cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: