The response of Owen White generally supports the notion of computing objective study outcomes for the purpose of reviewing single-subject research. He suggests, however, that our model is not sensitive to trends and proposes a model for computing percentage of nonoverlapping data based upon consideration of baseline trends. We respond that although such a procedure has theoretical merit, it has little practical utility due to the limited number of observations typically found in single-subject baselines; furthermore, when reliable and substantial baseline trends are found, interpretability of study outcomes is seriously limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scruggs et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: