Key result
Atorvastatin did not differ significantly from rivaroxaban in reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (2.3% vs 2.2%, OR 0.953) in high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Why the study?
Thromboprophylaxis in cancer is limited by cost, bleeding risks, and injectable formulations, prompting evaluation of anti-inflammatory statins as an alternative for DVT prevention during chemotherapy.
Does atorvastatin prevent deep vein thrombosis compared to rivaroxaban in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy?
RCT (n=86)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does atorvastatin prevent deep vein thrombosis compared to rivaroxaban in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy?
Odds Ratio: 0.953 (95% CI 0.24–3.971)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.3% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=1.000
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily showed similar efficacy to rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for DVT prevention in high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and better cost-effectiveness.
Background : Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in cancer. Although thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients is recommended by the guidelines, clinicians’ use of thromboprophylaxis remains limited due to cost, bleeding complications, and reluctance to give injectable anticoagulants. Inflammation plays essential roles in the pathogenesis of cancer-associated thrombosis. Owing to its ability to decrease proinflammatory cytokines, statins have anti-inflammatory properties. Thus, statins can be possibly utilized as thromboprophylaxis therapy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Objective : To compare the effectiveness of atorvastatin and rivaroxaban for DVT prevention in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Methods : Double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving cancer patients with high-risk of thrombosis undergoing chemotherapy. We randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive atorvastatin 20 mg or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for up to 90 days. Doppler ultrasonography was performed 90 days following chemotherapy to diagnose DVT. Average cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to analyze the cost of atorvastatin compared to rivaroxaban Results : Of the eighty six patients who underwent randomization, primary efficacy end point was observed in 1 of 42 patients (2.3%) in the atorvastatin group and in 1 of 44 (2.2%) in the rivaroxaban group (Odds Ratio [OR], 0.953; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.240 to 3.971; p = 1.000). There was a significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding, 2 of 42 patients (4.8%) in the atorvastatin group and 12 of 44 (27.3%) in the rivaroxaban group (OR, 0.257; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.94; p=0.007). The average cost-effectiveness ratio of using atorvastatin was lower than that of rivaroxaban. Conclusion : Atorvastatin did not differ significantly from rivaroxaban in reducing the incidence of DVT, lower bleeding risk, and cost-effectiveness for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Trial Registration ISRCTN39181.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setiawan et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Cancer with high risk of thrombosis undergoing chemotherapy (n=86). Atorvastatin vs. Rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was evaluated on Occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) confirmed by duplex ultrasound (OR 0.953, 95% CI 0.240-3.971, p=1.000). Atorvastatin did not differ significantly from rivaroxaban in reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (2.3% vs 2.2%, OR 0.953) in high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: