Why the study?
Does a support vector machine using electrocardiographic RR interval descriptive statistics accurately detect atrial fibrillation?
Does a support vector machine using electrocardiographic RR interval descriptive statistics accurately detect atrial fibrillation?
An SVM-based machine learning algorithm using RR interval descriptive statistics can detect atrial fibrillation with high sensitivity and specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SVM performance supports algorithmic AF detection development; leaves open clinical validation in prospective cohorts.
This paper proposes a new technique for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF). The method employs electrocardiographic features and support vector machine (SVM). The features include descriptive statistics of electrocardiographic RR interval. The RR interval is the distance in time between two consecutive R-peaks of electrocardiogram. AF detections using SVM with different electrocardiographic features and different SVM free parameters are explored. Employing SVM with the optimal free parameters and all the proposed electrocardiographic features, we find an AF detection technique with a comparable performance. The best performance obtained by the technique is 98.47% and 97.84%, in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuryani et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: